"Mexico: A revolution in Art : 1910-1940 at the Royal Academy in London is not the survey its title suggests. It is more like a visual version of the children's game, Pin the Tail the Donkey. There is a little of this and a little of that; a random, scatter shot selection.Too often an artist is represented by a single work. Paintings by Mexicans and mixed together with those of foreigners. The big names are here but usually not their best works: Frida Kahlo, currently the most famous Mexican artist among foreigners, is represented by a single oval miniature. It is a fine, expressive work but it feels more like a box ticked (she could not be left out) than an example of her achievements. The same applies to works on view by Rivera, Siqeieros, Orozco and Tomayo. So the show does not add up to much but neither is it a waste of time. For example, two large watercolours by the English artist Edward Burra (1905-1976) are powerful and arresting . El Paseo, 1938 (below), from a private collection,makes you feel the heat, sensuality, presence of death which must have seemed intoxicatingly exotic, alluring and frightening --to a him as a foreigner. Burra's Mexican Church
The Mexican and foreign photographers whose work is on view seem to have had more in common aesthetically than the painters. Maybe that's a way of saying that there is not the same impression of marked originality. Or maybe they saw more of each others work and were able to steal from each other more comfortably. Anyway for me, already familiar with the photographs of Tina Modotti, Edward Weston and Henri Cartier Bresson, the photographs of Manuel Alvarez Bravo have the greatest impact. At first sight I immediately wanted to own his 1931 Lords of the Dance (below).
The show continues until 29 September.
No comments:
Post a Comment